Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03021 12
Original file (03021 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

BAN
Docket No. 03021-12
9 October 2012

 

Dear CPO Matos:

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552;

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

9 October 2012. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered
the advisory opinions furnished by the Chief of Naval Personnel (CNP)
memo 7220 Ser N130C/12U1151 of 28 Sept 2012 and CNP memo 7220 Ser
N130C/12U0658 of 21 May 2012, copies of which are attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is

on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

Sincerely,

 

 

 

 

error or injustice.
)
PN
—W-DEAN PFE: FHR\)

Executive Director

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09489 12

    Original file (09489 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/12U1289 dated 13 November 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2386 13

    Original file (NR2386 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U0912 dated 16 October 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4696 13

    Original file (NR4696 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1070 dated > a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0322-13

    Original file (NR0322-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U0596 dated 26 June 2013, a Copy of which ig attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01842 12

    Original file (01842 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07748 12

    Original file (07748 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7963 13

    Original file (NR7963 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO7963-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12381 11

    Original file (12381 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C4/12U0026 dated 10 Feb 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01292-01

    Original file (01292-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 1292-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14

    Original file (NR9699 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...